Flag of the American Commonwealth Republics


Here It Goes:

Having proposed the election fail-safe and the electoral college safe mode we now consider the next step.....

The progressive anti-constitutionalists in their efforts have furnished us with all the justifications to reject the vote of tainted electors or favor the vote of legit alternate presidential electors. Election protocols were haphazardly changed in several states favoring the use of mail-in ballots without the necessary time, testing and security features which in doing so helped create inflated results yielding an unfair advantage. Affidavits, testimony, statistical analysis and now revealing video indicate that the election irregularities originate from questionable electronic tallies, slack mail-in oversight and other possible nefarious actions as observers were blocked. Accordingly, states awarding electors under questionable margins in this fog are ripe for rectification.

Beyond just ballot chicanery lies the state of Pennsylvania where the election system was altered in violation of its constitution which renders their initial elector slate invalid. There is no doubt of this as their state constitution requires a referendum and adequate public notice of such changes but this did not occur. On top of that their governor, attorney general and supreme court helped advance other decrees over the processing of mail-in ballots which affect the appointment of electors without the approval of the legislature which makes their popular presidential election unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution as well. Texas followed by other states filed a case to the Supreme Court against four states - Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia - claiming their electors were similarly appointed improperly after the court denied to hear a case brought against Pennsylvania alone.

Preservation of the Republic and its constitutional rights gives further impetus to counting the vote of only the legit electors. We will need electors of sufficient number in opposition to an administration agreeing to or taking weak stands against such issues as:

  • Impeachment relying on a known phony dossier

  • Open immigration, weak borders and sanctuary cities for illegal aliens

  • Acquiescence to China's rise in power and their threat of piracy, human rights abuses, debt traps and slacking on punishment for the purposeful spread of COVID-19

  • Draconian lockdowns hampering our economy which lack evidence of effectiveness in preventing the transmission of COVID-19

  • Zealot green policies ending our oil independence

  • Reversing America-first domestic and foreign policies

  • Ending private health insurance for a government health system

  • Tolerating BLM & Antifa's riot tactics and their riling racialism in order to pressure America into Marxism

  • Cancel culture, censorship from Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Hollywood which advances wokeism

  • Granting statehood to the constitutionally prescribed district of D.C. and the indebted, power-grid corrupt territory of Puerto Rico in order to permanently change the balance of power

  • Abolishing the right to bear arms and other constitutional provisions

  • Eliminate, dilute or nullify the Electoral College

  • Persecuting the orange president, his family and his supporters

With all their over-the-top, unorthodox or subversive manipulations to the system progressives have no leg to stand on in countering state legislature supremacy in appointment of presidential electors according to Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution. Any popular presidential election is not a right but a mere revocable privilege granted by the state legislatures and such reasonable revocation, alterations or substitution in order to correct irregularities, fraud or constitutional violations should face no complaint.

Considering the progressives' support of the National Popular Vote (NPV) effort which gets state legislatures in states who have signed the pact to eventually award electors not by their own popular vote results but instead according to the national popular vote, we can see their lack of consistency concerning opposition here to doable elector overrides by state legislatures or the rejection of certain electors by Congress on the day of counting elector votes. The NPV is championed by progressives as a way to make more inert the constitutional check of the Electoral College. So the progressive cause is without merit when they claim direct state legislature appointments of presidential electors or the rejection of electors by Congress on valid grounds over their legitimacy is a "coup".

-Top- -Links- -Bottom-

*anchor for 'Links'*



'So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally. The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.'

'They have all these electors, and wait, there's Pennsylvania, well, Pennsylvania's electors are tainted, because they're presented to the United State Congress which will then select the President and Vice President of the United States after they count them, they are presented to the United States Congress, but it could be argued that they're illegitimate, because the state legislature didn't follow the state's own constitution.'

'...unless the US Supreme Court, as it did in Bush v. Gore, exercises legitimately its power of judicial review, we have a potential constitutional crisis in this matter, and one way or another, Congress will have to resolve it on January 6th.' ~ Mark Levin (Posted By Tim Hains) | December 7, 2020

'No, The Georgia Vote-Counting Video Was Not 'Debunked'. Not Even Close'

'Local NBC journalists on site that night independently confirmed "they were told counting was done for the night" and given no indication it would continue before the next morning. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution even reported of a "plan" to stop scanning ballots at the same time the poll watchers said things were shut down:'

'(The video, which shows the room from four different angles, fully supports the claim that poll watchers were kept away from meaningful observation of ballot handling.)'

'Lead Stories claims it is funded by Facebook, Google, and ByteDance. The latter is the Beijing-based and China Communist Party-linked company known for TikTok. Facebook and Google have suppressed journalism deemed harmful to Trump's 2020 election opponent Joe Biden. The Trump administration has said TikTok's ties to the Chinese Communist government makes it a national security threat.' ~ By Mollie Hemingway | DECEMBER 7, 2020

'Trump grew his support among black voters by 50 percent over 2016. Nationally, Joe Biden's black support fell well below 90 percent, the level below which Democratic presidential candidates usually lose.'

'But, when the polls err, non-polling metrics do not; the latter have a 100 percent record. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump's reelection. For Trump to lose this election, the mainstream polls needed to be correct, which they were not. Furthermore, for Trump to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time; not an impossible outcome, but extremely unlikely nonetheless.'

'Statistically abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio' ~ Patrick Basham | November 27, 2020

'However, the recent effort to claim the Legislature could, through the passage of a simple majority resolution, declare this presidential election in dispute and assign a new slate of electors contrary to the winner of the popular vote in Pennsylvania is simply false.'

'It is true that the U.S. Constitution gives each state legislature the power to choose its electors; however, in 1937, Pennsylvania determined by law to do so by requiring electors be awarded to the certified winner of the statewide popular vote. Should the Legislature wish to change this law, or choose electors in a different manner, such a change can be made only through the passage of legislation to implement a new law that would only affect future elections.' ~ SENS. RYAN AUMENT AND SCOTT MARTIN | Dec 4, 2020

If such rationale were to hold then the Pennsylvania electors would be considered at best null and void and for neither candidate because of the illegitimate changes made to their election system in violation of the Pennsylvania constitution. However, the electors clause in the Constitution renders the 1937 law above mentioned unconstitutional and non-binding. How? It wouldn't make sense to have all future incarnations of the Pennsylvania legislature within presidential elector cycles unable to appoint electors in such manner as they may direct because of a state law albeit passed by one prior legislature in 1937. Such a law violates the intentions and supremacy of the electors clause.

Even if the current legislature wants to voluntarily comply with the 1937 law and rely on the results of the popular election for president in Pennsylvania to determine unanimous electors, those automated results have not materialized not only due to the margin of fraud or irregularities but also because of the election's unconstitutionality under the Pennsylvania constitution. This unconstitutionality is a result of not adequately informing the public of the election mail-in changes and not having the required referendum over the mail-in changes as the state constitution prescribes. Thus no legal popular election for president even took place in Pennsylvania.

The legislature of Pennsylvania should be able to convene on its own accord empowered by the electors clause in order to perform the federal function of appointing electors for president. In fact it must in order to prevent their electors from being declared n/a by Congress on the day of official count.

'3 U.S. Code ~2 makes clear that the Legislature can directly appoint Electors even after election day if there is a failure for any reason of an election:

'The brief clarifies that the selection of a president is a federal function. It is a process of the U.S. government for choosing the federal president. The legislature is not setting laws governing within their state. Therefore, all the usual mechanisms of a state do not play a role. This does not involve the Governor, the courts, election officials, etc. '

'However, we need to offer the Supreme Court legal claims that are neutral, clear, objective, and unbiased. The conservative wing of the Supreme Court will only respond to a pure constitutional issue that is universally true, not just for one election, and which does not cast them in the light of choosing the president.' ~ Jonathon Moseley | December 7, 2020


'Until the mid-1800s, it was common for many state legislatures to simply appoint electors, while other states let their citizens decide on electors.'

'The Constitution doesn't require electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states, and there is no federal law that requires this. But a number of states have passed laws that threaten to punish so-called "faithless electors," who do not vote according to the state's popular vote.' ~ SARAH PRUITT | OCT 21, 2020

'In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from the ones to whom they were pledged...... Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.'

'In the days after the presidential election, President Donald Trump and Republicans have filed lawsuits in five battleground states to contest a race Trump lost to Democratic challenger and former Vice President Joe Biden.'

'Here's a quick look at noteworthy lawsuits from Trump and the Republican party, with details by state below: ~ George Petras | Updated 6:12 p.m. EST Nov. 23, 2020

'The team ran several major analyses including of voters who had moved out of state but still voted in the state they had left; voters who registered to vote using a post office box number rather than a residential address as required; voters who requested a mail-in ballot and sent it in, only for it not to be counted; voters who didn't request a mail-in ballot and didn't receive one, but discovered a vote had been cast in their name; as well as research on people who voted more than once and on those who are listed in the death index.'

"The number of questionable ballots surpasses the vote margin in at least three states right now-Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin," Braynard told The Epoch Times on Nov. 25. Those three states have a combined total of 37 electoral votes.'

"It's unfortunate, but short of a judge ordering a do-over, another election... short of that, I really don't see how you fix this," Braynard said.' ~ BY CHARLOTTE CUTHBERTSON | November 26, 2020 Updated: November 27, 2020

'In recent modern elections, there have been a dozen or more truly competitive battlegrounds which could result in many various paths to 270 electoral votes.'

'That's changed in recent years as polarization has increased, resulting in red and blue strongholds with bigger victory margins. For instance, despite the narrow popular vote margin in 2016, more than two dozen states were decided by margins of 15 percentage points or more. In 1988, when the popular vote margin was seven percentage points, there were just 17 states which were won by such big margins.'

'In 2020, many political analysts think that Wisconsin, where Democrats will hold their national convention in 2020, could prove to be the tipping point state in a close election.'


'By convincing so many of their supporters to vote by mail, the Democrats may have created a problem that could plunge the nation into a post-Election Day tangle of challenges and lawsuits that will make the Bush v. Gore nightmare of 2000 look like a picnic.' ~ JONATHAN TOBIN | 10/13/20 AT 8:00 AM EDT

'The expected uncertainty about the election's outcome stems from states' decision to permit widespread mail-in balloting, a move that opens the door to fraud and abuse and may result in millions of ballots being thrown out by state and national election officials.' ~ BY JUSTIN HASKINS | 10/13/20 08:30 AM EDT

'Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urged Americans to wear masks in public, no major outbreaks have been traced to voting queues. Experts now say that voting with a mask on is no more dangerous than going to a grocery store with a mask on--something millions of American do every week.' ~ Derek Thompson | SEPTEMBER 30, 2020

-Top- -Links- -Bottom-

Commonwealth Party
Justification of Elector Override
December 17, 2020