As far as two-way races are concerned, does it not strike you as suspicious that at every level of government across the country the ballot for those offices looks something like this:
(You can play with the buttons!) Not all races are limited to just two contestants. Some allow for third parties / independents or write-ins to be on the ballot. However with the ballot access and campaign finance laws favoring Democrat & Republican parties over all the others, it has not been probable or perhaps even feasible to get an independent or third-party candidate elected to office in most contests despite some exceptions. Certain commentators for the powers that be chide us that third parties and independents diminish or split the vote of the constituencies of either of the two main parties and can enable the other side (the greater evil) to prevail in an election. In addition we are told that a two-party system provides a mechanism towards a majority decision in which election outcomes will more often reflect the will of most of the people. After considering all that let's ask ourselves these questions: Is the two-party system really providing the best candidates? Doesn't it cater to a more lackluster, common-denominator-seeking party machine? Does it respond to a polarized electorate well? How well does it handle the more centrist or moderate forces and candidates? Has it filtered out the radicals and extremists? How well can it steer the country via elections and then handle governing? Are you still satisfied with its choices and results? Answers to these questions may vary concerning particular periods in our history or with certain elections. There are other ways that can provide better representation and response and are more ethical and deserving of a free country. So again as far as two-way races go, wouldn't it be better if we had a ballot that looked like this:
While this ballot is an idealized example, an election system geared towards open competition amongst all parties could approximate this or at least give a better chance of changing which two parties will be dominant. So with a more true and diverse selection from an initial multi-party mix, we can get more competition and choice in the final binary ballot. Now we ask the following questions: Has pickling between Democrat and Republican in virtually all offices led our country down the right path? Won't they yet again run one way and govern in another? Which of the following will be more effective and rewarding: Battling the well-funded elitist establishment of the two parties or instead battling your local elections board for access towards more grassroots candidates? To further this cause, the more similar third parties should not waste time, money and effort competing against each other in the same constituencies. Instead, they should agree to hold conference(s) in order to divvy up which precincts, districts, counties or states they will run candiates in. Perhaps they can do such in checkerboard fashion. Another option is for each third party to agree to run candidates in an alternating way while forming a united front for the relevant third parties during the campaign. Electoral Reform TheoryOur bicameral electoral college plan gives states elector shares in the electoral college near to the proportions they hold in Congress. It awards each state's slate of electors to the various candidates in various proportions as opposed to all-or-nothing thus orientating a presidency more for the whole union as opposed to one more geared for the solid red or blue states won out in the swings. The score or range vote can be incorporated making for further competition as opposed to a greater concentration between two evils. http://www.commonwealthparty.net/electoralcollege.htm In addition to reforming our election system and abolishing the two-party
menace, we should increase the refresh rate of our public offices to prevent
the specter of career politicians putting office before constituents or country.
'Is fusion voting - judged purely on its own merits - a good idea? On the plus side, it probably is somewhat helpful to third parties. It allows third parties to grow (unfortunately for them with a rather weak definition of both "party" and "grow") without dying in infancy due to the spoiler trainwreck.' Delayed versus Instant runoff
Two-Party Government Dysfunctions
A tabulation of various congressional polls over the years. Congress has not had much popularity historically, but it has
been really low the last few decades and especially now. Wouldn't having a higher refresh rate of congressional members
bring some improvement? Not to mention breaking down the main two parties' overwhelming occupation of the body.
Congress really sucks. Not only do we have to enlighten the voters and cure the education system - we need systematic
reforms to how we choose our leaders.
Back in the day, Republican Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts who took the seat from Democrat Ted Kennedy decided to vote for the questionable $15 billion jobs bill. Two votes were needed for passage and Scott was one. Some Republicans sure know how to screw up things. The RNC backed a Republican candidate in the New York 23rd that was more Democrat than the Democrat opponent was! 'Another Gallup finding that should alert Democrats is the ongoing collapse of public confidence in government. A
survey released earlier this week found that Americans now believe that the federal government wastes 51 cents of
every dollar it spends, the highest estimate ever recorded. Twenty-five years ago, that figure stood at only 38 cents. '
Democrats Obama, Reid and Pelosi demonstrated their success and popularity by latching onto health care "reform".
- - - - - - - - - - - - Defunct Links - - - - - - - - - - - -
'This is the new mainstream in American politics, and it's growing among younger voters. More than 40% of college
undergraduates identify themselves as independents, according to a summer 2008 survey by Harvard University's Institute
of Politics (IOP). "Half of young Americans do not identify with traditional party or ideological labels - they are the new
center in American politics," says John Della Volpe of IOP.'
'USA Today reports that the Democratic and Republican parties are shrinking at a rapid pace. Faced with few choices at
the ballot box, American voters are increasingly holding their collective noses to vote in (D) or (R) candidates while
simultaneously detaching themselves from party affiliation.'
'Scozzafava has been endorsed by the Republican leadership in Congress and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and has received roughly $1 million from the National Republican Congressional Committee.'
|