COMMONWEALTH PARTY
OF AMERICA


Flag of the American Commonwealth Republics





Midterm Reaction







First off -- that midterm was much ado about nothing as any potential red wave fizzled and the national Republicans chose the same-old party leaders for the most part helping to impede any meaningful nationalist-populist agenda. The message from the national Republican party as a whole is clear -- they are not an integral vessel towards reformational change. Their acquiescence in leadership and senatorial sell-outs to the omnibus demonstrates that beyond a doubt. As a whole they do business as usual which means yet another half-ass approach.


Primaries are a manipulated farce and party members should instead have a better mechanism that decides whether someone can actually classify themselves or even run as a candidate for their party. The electorate should not have a two-party system dictated to them through the preprinted ballot. Voters should at least be able at some point to further subdivide the imposed parties into separately funded and functioning entities like progressives and blue dogs derived from Democrats, moderates and red cats from Republicans. The RNC, DNC and other machines should be constrained, decentralized or eliminated especially with regard to candidate funding. Until the two-party machine is neutralized there can be no meaningful reform as the Republicans have demonstrated in the midterms.


Voters have become disillusioned and will settle for complaining about the victorious officeholders they oppose instead of showing up to elect backstabbers and sellouts to their causes. Embracing ballot harvesting only helps to increase the number of votes but does not help with party performance. The Republicans deserve to lose again in 2024 as they refuse to relinquish the Democrat-Republican duopoly that will never solve the problems it created. It will be more satisfying to vote for an unlikely-to-win third party or independent than march in to vote yet again for some lesser evil that allows for the greater evil anyway.


If the establishment parties had any sense of honor to do right by the country and even for the future image of themselves then they would have altered their leadership and refocused their priorities long ago. McConnell would not still be the Republicans' senate leader and Democrat elders in the House would not be resistant to mere committee term limits. Biden was elected to act as a more rational and calm president and unite the country while governing from a more centrist position but instead he has been an out-of-touch gaslighter giving us the worst of both worlds by succumbing to far left demands for diversity hires, woke agendas, bureaucratic overreach and fiscal irresponsibility while neither really challenging the ways of the establishment. The Dems should insist at this juncture that Kamala Harris find a quiet exit due to her word salads, record staff resignations and the border fiasco and that Biden appoint a statesman figure to finish out as vice president. One candidate (should he be willing to take the job) would be former Senator Sam Nunn who while older than Biden still appears (at least in his latest videos) fully cognizant and has the experience and current involvement in national security issues which would be ideal at this time with all that is happening about the Ukraine conflict and with all the military hardware being sent there. The Democrats as you may have noticed don't really have much else of presidential gravitas left.




Observing a Sample Ballot


Here we have a county ballot and its iterations for the various districts. With our Ballot Caps plank, about half or so of the non referenda offices would be removed from the ballot with those judicial positions appointed by a relevant body or appropriate officials instead of nearly doubling the public office election roll with candidates the voters are not likely to be familiar with or races they are not cognizant of. There needs to be a branch of government not subject to the pandering of popular elections. We also find some races on the ballots that are labeled as "non-partisan" which is a disservice to voters making it harder for them to discern the type of candidates and likely stances taken on the issues. It is bad enough the ballots mostly limit the races to only the two establishment parties and then they erase the ability for voters to identify where the remaining candidates would stand ideologically. We also see in some cases races where only one candidate runs unopposed. That is absurd. Why can't there be at least an allowance for the third parties or independents to be on the ballot whenever one of the establishment parties decides not to put up a competitor? Note the high passage of the bond referenda without indicating on the ballot who pays the taxes and how much per home value for all the wonderful, "pain-free" and compassionate goodies yet again.


The two-party system exercises its unfair duopoly in most of the other races by ballot access laws and even through the spoiler effect of third-parties attempting office in standard plurality races. If a single candidate is unavoidable then they should be required to run on a 'yes' / 'no' basis where the public decides whether the sole candidate is worthy of the office and if they are disapproved then either the party submits a new candidate for a future election or some appropriate body or officials in the new government appoint someone to hold the position until new candidates are nominated by the public for an election. With ballots like the ones presented here, it should be no surprise that we end up with a government that has no incentive to abide by the will of the people and the constituents have less and less desire to bother participating as voting becomes less effective. The status adherence to plurality voting over range/score voting perpetuates such outcomes. Until the changes prescribed here are taken, we will be governed by caricatures of our society rather than by representative citizens.




Addressing Electoral Integrity Concerns


Now with respect to guaranteeing a republican form of government as the Constitution directs (Article IV, Section 4) it is way past time to act against the type of election nonsense that has occurred in some of the past few elections to varying degrees that consist of eyewitness accounts to ballot tampering, social media manipulations, denial of bipartisan election observations, mysteriously appearing or disappearing ballots, lax oversight of mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting with courts dismissing cases more due to legal technicalities. We especially note the counting fiasco of Maricopa ('Mea Culpa') County, AZ where tallying of ballots has yet again taken days to complete. All this can lead to a loss of confidence in the voting system whether the claims of impropriety are real, rumored or exaggerated. Therefore we consider putting forth a series of corrective measures in order to discourage election malfeasance and failures; bypassing an unstable popular result when experiencing substantial, unjustified irregularities.


Election boards and authorities will be expected to have thoroughly tested their equipment before and after setting up the polls for election day. Back-up equipment should be readily accessible to the precincts. Election observers and monitors should have full and secure access. Unless there are extenuating circumstances beyond control (which did not happen in Maricopa Couny) election tallies should be completed in orderly fashion on schedule. If such a schedule is not met or other substantial and inexcusable electoral ineptitude or malfeasance occurs then an outline of corrective measures will apply.




Timetables


We now put forward a latter timetable expected to be met for tallying votes in state and federal elections (whose outcomes can affect constitutional function) within every state. It should be quite feasible considering how races have been tallied in more modern times sans the troubled cases.



 IDEALLY 16 AND NO LATER THAN 20 HOURS AFTER POLLS CLOSE:

3/4 of state and federal races should be counted with 75% of votes tallied in remaining undetermined races.


 IDEALLY 20 AND NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER POLLS CLOSE:

9/10 state and federal races should be counted with 90% of votes tallied in remaining undetermined races.


 IDEALLY 24 AND NO LATER THAN 28 HOURS AFTER POLLS CLOSE:

All state and federal races should be counted with 100% of the votes tallied.


After 28 hours the only counting of ballots that should be occurring are for close races where recounts have been invoked or requested. State and federal races should meet these hourly timetables in all states unless there has been substantial disruption by forces of nature or significant man-made events. Otherwise when delayed tallies occur without such disruptions as in Maricopa County, AZ in 2020 and 2022; corrective action will be taken according to the official levels responsible, the cycle and offices affected.





Missed Timetables, General Failures, Perfidy
in State and Federal Races:


When the right to vote is denied effectively by inaccurate election tallies or confidence in the electoral system is lost through questionable or drawn-out process due to malfeasance, incompetence or common corruption; the precedent provided by Amendment XIV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution suggests to us a corrective measure:


♦  Concurrent to a general presidential election or any state or federal run-off, special election or primary afterward but before the congressional midterm election -- should the state elections board, state agencies, state courts or state government be found culpable by direct action or lax oversight then the elector slate allotted for the next presidential election will be reduced by one-third (rounded to the nearest whole elector) at most once in period.


♦  Concurrent to a congressional midterm election or any state or federal run-off, special election or primary afterward but before the general presidential election -- should the state elections board, state agencies, state courts or state government be found culpable by direct action or lax oversight then the elector slate allotted for the next presidential election will be reduced by one-third (rounded to the nearest whole elector) at most once in period.


So for such occurrences, a state's allotted elector slate for the next general presidential election may be reduced by one-third either once or twice by the next general presidential election. The total number of electoral college electors will be accordingly reduced.




Awry Tally Recourse


In cases where the election tallies go awry to the extent that whatever incompetence, malfeasance or corruption makes it impossible to determine the true outcome then we look to one possible alternate avenue of choosing winners as an option to having a redo of the popular election or having some court decree the outcome without regard to any determinable recount or other backup. In these situations for state and federal offices, we can choose to rely on all the counties of the state to determine a winner from amongst the candidates on the original ballot who are free of any charges concerning the election debacle. Such statewide county proportions would be applied in lieu of the whole statewide popular result or perhaps just for particular precincts, districts or county tallies unsettled. Should a candidate be charged then the next highest candidate in their previous primary reaching proper threshold would be considered by the counties and if not available then the relevant party leaders will nominate an eligible candidate. In the choosing, both the county chairs-elect and commissioners-elect who will partake must also be clear of charges concerning any election debacle. The form of the county choice will be as follows according to the particular office:


PRESIDENT:   By Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 the legislatures determine the manner of appointment of the electors and by inference of Clause 4 resolve them before deadline. When a legislature relies on a statewide popular vote to determine the electors without any embedded districts (unlike Maine, Nebraska) and the popular result breaks down to be indeterminate, as an option to choosing the electors directly themselves the legislature may wish to use more localized offices somewhat closer to the popular vote distribution or sentiments which may be provided by the county boards choosing the electors using the same ballot afforded to the original voters when candidates are kosher. Here the state's elector slate (possibly reduced) gets prescribed in a manner influenced by Amendment XII's House quorum of state delegations invoked in that case when there is a hung electoral college. Hence the state's elector slate will be determined by votes taken by counties -- the board of each county yielding one vote for their favored candidate.

The whole slate of electors is granted to the majority-of-counties winner if the state electors are granted as all-or-nothing by the usual statewide popular vote. If there is no majority-of-counties winner at first, the candidate(s) having the least counties won is eliminated {with such ties tilting by population of counties carried} and the process repeats within such counties until there is a majority-of-counties winner. Any tie from there can be broke by the governor-elect. If no majority-of-counties winner emerges from all of this, the legislature chooses winner. Should any state's elector slate usually be awarded proportionally according to results of a statewide popular vote then the slate in like manner is awarded according to the proportions of counties won by the candidates. As well, a majority-of-counties winner or proportions of counties won can also be applied in lieu of particular unsettled precincts, districts or county subsets of the whole in a way influenced by the usual method used or whim of the legislature as mentioned in the second paragraph above.


SENATOR:   As long as there is a statewide popular vote for choosing a U.S. senator, we reference the immediately above Amendment XII influenced option for presidential races in all-or-nothing cases. Hence for a substitute statewide result, the state's U.S. senate seat would be determined by votes taken by counties, the board of each county yielding one favorite and the seat is granted to a majority-of-counties winner. If there is no such majority at first, the least-counties-won candidate(s) is eliminated in those counties and the process repeats until a majority-of-counties winner emerges using the same tie protocols and last resorting to the legislature for lack of result. Also, application to just the unsettled subset components can be used (to precincts, districts, certain counties) and with the relative counties won by each candidate if desired.



FEDERAL AND STATE DISTRICT OFFICES   (STATE LEGISLATURE,
U.S. HOUSE, STATE JUDICIAL, PRESIDENTIAL ELECTOR DISTRICTS):

Such popular vote districts constructed to grant single winners for such positions can likewise be optionally determined by the state's county quorum inspired by Amendment XII. In-lieu subset application applies too with proportionalities if desired.



GOVERNOR:   One possible fix for an undecipherable, botched popular election for governor would be a gubernatorial electoral college determined in such case solely by the counties of the state. The total number of electors would be such that half are allotted in equal number to each county and the other half distributed to counties with more regard to their relative populations. Each county assigns their electors to particular gubernatorial candidates in a manner the county board directs and the one who gets a majority of the gubernatorial electoral college vote becomes the governor. If the state feels need to only settle subset components of a popular gubernatorial election, the electoral college result can be applied within such components when the rest of the popular vote tally is considered sound.


Maybe not just for settling the unknowns of a current election tally debacle, these provisions might be useful restrictions in the next election for a particular office if there is a pervasive lack of confidence in the ability of the relevant authorities to carry out that next election without unexcused anomalies. We let the appropriate bodies decide.




Local Adoption


We should also require state legislatures to prescribe and enforce similar timetables and settlement options to local elections like for mayors, city alderman, county chairs, etc. with analogous corrective and punitive measures against electoral ineptitude and perfidy. Penalties would include reduced pay, fines and sentences for the more serious cases upon election officials who fail to uphold stable election tallies for any election whether federal, state or local. One would think such prescription is likely the case to varying degrees in states and localities already.













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-








*anchor for 'Sources'*







*anchor for 'Leadership Same Old, Same Old'



Leadership Does Same Old, Same Old


'Eighteen Republicans joined all 48 Democrats and two independents in passing the bill.....The final vote was 68-29.'

'Trump had urged all members of his party to vote against the bill and called the bill a "disaster" for the Republican Party since Republican senators could have stopped it. Trump also criticized Democrats for pushing the bill through Congress before Republicans take control of the House in the new year.'

'Here is a full list of Republican senators who voted in favor of the bill:' ~ ANNA SKINNER | 12/22/22 AT 4:22 PM EST

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-republican-senators-who-voted-pass-1-7-trillion-omnibus-bill-1769176




'In this year’s midterms, the Republican leader of the United States Senate went out of his way to defeat Republican candidates for the United States Senate.'

'And just who was financing Murkowski over the Republican nominee, the state party’s endorsed candidate for the U.S. Senate, Kelly Tshibaka?'

'You guessed it. Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell.'

'In other words, if you were a Trump-supporting Republican Senate nominee this election cycle, Mitch McConnell would rather that you lost than that he help create a Republican Senate.' ~ JEFFREY LORD | December 25, 2022, 9:17 PM

https://spectator.org/senate-mitch-mcconnell-problem-american-spectator-print-magazine/




'McConnell has held that leadership job in the Senate since 2007 and was widely expected to hold onto it despite Scott's suggestion Tuesday that there should be a "bold change" after the GOP failed to retake control of the chamber in last week's midterm election.'

'Kentucky's longtime senator never seemed to sweat the outcome, and the vote was not close. Thirty-seven Republican senators stuck with McConnell, while 10 voted not to keep him and one abstained from weighing in at all, USA TODAY reported.' ~ Morgan Watkins | Nov. 16 2022

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/mitch-mcconnell/2022/11/16/kentucky-mitch-mcconnell-reelected-senate-republican-leader/69654373007/




'But House GOP leader McCarthy, with only four party votes to spare and an open rebellion among a handful of House conservatives, needs all the support he can get — even if it comes from a member-elect steeped in scandal.'

'House Republicans generally believe Santos’ future will become clearer once they have an official speaker. But right now, the Republican leader has five members threatening publicly to oppose his speakership bid on Jan. 3, which happens to be the same number required to block him from reaching the needed 218 votes. And the party is buckling in for potentially multiple votes, marking only the second time since the Civil War that the speakership race would go beyond a first ballot.'

'And the private chatter could translate to a frosty reception from his colleagues once in office. LaLota is sure to have company among Republicans in his belief that Santos’ antics paint the rest of them in a dim light, just as they prepare to take power after a campaign focused on holding the Biden administration accountable.' ~ OLIVIA BEAVERS | 12/28/2022 05:53 PM EST

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/28/george-santos-kevin-mccarthy-house-speaker-00075706




'While Biggs’ challenge was always viewed as a long shot, the number of Republicans who voted for him underscored the level of frustration with the Republican leadership following the 2022 elections.'

'Biggs, a former chair of the House Freedom Caucus, announced on Newsmax on Monday night that he would run against McCarthy, while acknowledging it would be “tough” to beat someone who has “raised a lot of money” to elect his colleagues.'

'Biggs was nominated Tuesday by Texas Rep. Chip Roy and South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, who asserted that the House GOP conference needs to change the way the House operates.'

'During a closed-door leadership candidate forum on Monday, Virginia Rep. Bob Good, a McCarthy critic, complained that a Super PAC aligned with McCarthy opposed some pro-Trump candidates, and criticized McCarthy for not calling to congratulate him when he won his primary, according to a source in the room. McCarthy replied that he directed $2 million to Good for his race. Good had to be gaveled down in order to cut him off from speaking so they could move to the next question, the source said.' ~ Melanie Zanona, Alex Rogers and Manu Raju | Updated 5:40 PM EST, Tue November 15, 2022

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/15/politics/house-republican-vote-kevin-mccarthy/index.html




'The race for RNC chair comes as the GOP continues to lick its wounds from last month’s lackluster performance in the midterms. Republicans not only failed to win control of the Senate. They lost ground in the chamber, secured only a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives and lost some races for governor and control of a handful of state legislative chambers in what many party leaders predicted would be a "red wave" election.'

'Rep. Lee Zeldin of New York mulled a bid for RNC chair before announcing earlier this month he wouldn’t challenge the chairwoman — for now.'

"McDaniel should not run for a fourth term," Zeldin argued. "I won’t be running for RNC chair at this time with McDaniel’s re-election pre-baked by design, but that doesn’t mean she should even be running again. It’s time the GOP elects new leadership! It’s time for fresh blood!"

'With McDaniel and her declared or potential challengers all having ties to the former president, sources in Trump’s political orbit tell Fox News that, as of now, the former president remains neutral in the race for RNC chair.'

"I think they’re both good. I like them both," Trump said of McDaniel and Dhillon in an interview on Friday with Breitbart.'

'RNC committee members have been flooded with emails in recent weeks from Republican activists calling on McDaniel to go after Dhillon, and her allies shared the committee members' email addresses on social media.'

'With a month to go until the RNC’s winter meeting, the war of words in the chair race may escalate.'

'McDaniel emphasized that "my message is unity," and warned that "if we're so vitriolic with each other that we can't even come together to win elections, that's going to be a long-term problem in 2024." ~ Paul Steinhauser | December 19, 2022 2:00am EST

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rnc-chair-ronna-mcdaniel-says-supports-pretty-solid-she-faces-challengers-re-election-bid




'A generational fight is brewing inside the Democratic Caucus as a significant bloc of younger members is pushing for term limits for committee chairmen.'

'And in a potentially major shift that could anger the Congressional Black Caucus and other veteran lawmakers, Nancy Pelosi seems to be warming to the idea.'

'The move would bring a drastic change in the way the caucus operates. Pelosi’s possible embrace of the proposal shows just how much House Democratic politics have shifted in the month since the election. Democrats elected their largest freshmen class since Watergate, and many of the newcomers campaigned on the promise of bucking Pelosi or calling for new leadership.' ~ HEATHER CAYGLE | 12/05/2018 08:14 PM EST Updated: 12/05/2018 10:55 PM EST

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/05/pelosi-congress-term-limits-committee-chairmen-1046413













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Blue Dogs'



Blue Dogs


'The Blue Dog Coalition is an official caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives comprised of 19 fiscally-responsible Democrats, who are leading the way to find commonsense solutions. They are pragmatic Democrats, appealing to the mainstream values of the American public. The Blue Dogs are dedicated to pursuing fiscally-responsible policies, ensuring a strong national defense for our country, and transcending party lines to get things done for the American people.'

https://bluedogcaucus-murphy.house.gov/




'Blue Dog members say they still stand by the old centrist mantra of fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense, and commonsense solutions to practical problems. But their membership today reflects how much the demographic and geographic profiles of the Democratic Party have changed – and how much the political center has shifted.'

'Many push back against being labeled conservative, or even moderate. Representative Murphy would rather they’re called “pragmatic Democrats,” willing to work with Republicans and progressives alike to move practical legislation forward.'

“Bipartisanship, fiscal responsibility, defense, and working with business as well as labor ... the country is more reflective of that Blue Dog philosophy now,” Representative Schrader says.'

“Make America governable again,” Representative Brindisi adds. “That’s what got us into the majority.” ~ Jessica Mendoza Staff | June 4, 2019

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2019/0604/Centrist-Democrats-are-back.-But-these-are-not-your-father-s-Blue-Dogs













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Vice President Harris'



Vice President Harris


'Since taking office, Harris has been assigned one of the administration’s thorniest issues: stemming the influx of immigrants attempting to cross U.S. borders. Republicans have sought to make her the face of an issue that they believe could help them politically.'

'After taking on that role, Harris’ approval ratings began to decline, with unfavorable opinions surpassing favorable ones in June 2021. Whether the decline is directly related to the immigration debate is uncertain.'

'Past polls show how the favorability of previous vice presidents changed during their first four years in office. Harris' net favorability is slightly lower than that of former Vice President Mike Pence at this point in their respective tenures, and it's well under the ratings of three previous vice presidents.' ~ Matt Stiles, Ryan Murphy and Vanessa Martínez | Last updated December 20, 2022

https://www.latimes.com/projects/kamala-harris-approval-rating-polls-vs-biden-other-vps/




'Reports of turmoil have plagued Harris’s vice presidential office, with her chief of staff, communications director, press secretary, and other aides departing within the first 18 months.'

'The person disputed that former aides criticizing Harris were targeting her because of her race or gender. “When somebody raises an issue about Kamala, everybody’s like, you don’t want to see black women succeed. That’s completely backward. Everybody who goes to work for Kamala, by definition, wants to see her succeed. That’s why you take these jobs,” she said.' ~ Katherine Doyle | December 30, 2022 10:45 AM

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/harris-gamesmanship-torments-staff




'Vice President Kamala Harris lashed out at the media in an end-of-year interview claiming they have failed to cover her strengths during her tenure.'

'Harris, speaking with Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart who lavished praise on the VP, said that 'what you've been able to see is based on what gets covered.'

'Harris did not speak about her appointed role within the Biden administration to work on the crisis at the border, which has been referred to as a 'once-in-a-generation' storm in the wake of Title 42 having lapsed.'

'The Biden-Harris team is currently facing scrutiny over the chaos at the US-Mexico border as thousands of migrants are expected to try and seek asylum or sneak through.'

'According to excerpts published from a new book about the Biden administration's first two years by Politico on Tuesday, Biden called Harris a 'work in progress' and grew angry with her and second gentleman Doug Emhoff after hearing their complaints over her role in the administration.' ~ STEPHEN M. LEPORE | UPDATED: 21:57 EST, 23 December 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11570833/Kamala-Harris-lashes-media-failing-cover-strengths-VP-gushing-interview.html




“For years, Harris had been considered a front-runner to grab the 2020 ticket. Her moment was nigh. Yet, Harris’s campaign was a disaster. She withdrew from the race in December 2019, well before the DNC primaries.'

'When Harris bowed out early, her supporters – known as the #KHive – blamed the early exit on racism and sexism. The assertion is absurd given that the DNC’s preceding three presidential nominees were either black or female. No, Harris’s identity markers were the explicit reason why she was chosen for the vice presidential slot despite having run such a poor campaign. Racism and sexism are convenient, blanket excuses. But the reality is that Harris is just bad at politics.'

'So far, Harris’s tenure as VP has not gone particularly well.'

'Back in November 2021, Harris’s approval ratings cratered. “According to a November survey by USA Today, Ms. Harris’ public approval rating sat at 28 percent, making her one of the least popular vice-presidents in modern history – lower than Iraq War architect Dick Cheney, who was reviled by Democrats.” ~ Harrison Kass | Dec 28, 2022

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-the-next-president-of-united-states/ar-AA15JVd1




'Not that many even celebrate, mind you. In 2019, USA Today found that of those planning to celebrate a winter holiday, only 2.6 percent would be celebrating Kwanzaa. In 2012, NPR even asked, “Is Kwanzaa Still A Thing?"

'Vice President Kamala Harris used the occasion to double down on one of her more preposterous personal claims.'

'The problem here: Kamala Harris was born in 1964, before the holiday even existed, and long before it was popular enough that there was a high likelihood she was sitting on the floor as a wee tyke, talking with her sisters about the seven principles of Kwanzaa.'

'It’s too bad that “repeatedly making stuff up despite being called out on it” isn’t one of the seven principles celebrated during Kwanzaa. Then, not only could both Vice President Harris and President Biden have the same favorite principle, Harris could annually use the holiday to show just how dedicated to it she is.' ~ C. Douglas Golden | December 28, 2022 at 8:56am

https://ijr.com/harris-dubious-holiday-another-year-public-response-pure-ridicule/




'At year's end, Vice President Kamala Harris is making the rounds of syrupy and supportive interviews, but you can still wonder which of her communications staffers is going to quit after aerobically trying to prepare her for these softball sessions.'

'NPR promoted their Kamala cuddle on "All Things Considered" in the evening, on "Morning Edition," on their talk show "Here & Now" and at length on "The NPR Politics Podcast." On all but the last one, Khalid would helpfully introduce and frame the Harris answers instead of actually letting the audience hear her indolent inquiries.'

'As usual, the proof of a puffball interview isn't just the questions asked but those that were not asked. You could start with the feverish personnel turnover in her office, and then add tensions with President Joe Biden. Politico is reporting Biden vented early on that his veep was a "work in progress" and that Doug Emhoff, the vice president's lawyer spouse, was bitterly complaining about the tough issues added to his wife's policy portfolio that could hurt her presidential prospects.' ~ Tim Graham | Dec 23, 2022

https://townhall.com/columnists/brentbozellandtimgraham/2022/12/23/coddling-kamala-harris-at-christmas-n2617498













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Senator Sam Nunn'



Senator Sam Nunn


'In his nearly thirteen years as a US Senator from Georgia, conservative Democrat Sam Nunn has earned the respect of colleagues of all ideological persuasions on both sides of the aisle for his savvy on defense issues, his parliamentary skills in debating them, and his record of consistently supporting a strong national defense without becoming the Pentagon’s puppet.'

'Senator Nunn introduced an amendment to the Fiscal Year 1985 military authorization bill that would have frozen and then drastically cut the number of US troops in Europe unless the NATO allies did more to shoulder their monetary and military share of the burden of defending western Europe.'

'Shortly after coming to the Senate, for example, Senator Nunn fought and voted against a proposal by Sen. Mike Mansfield (D-Mont.), at the time the Senate Majority Leader and now US Ambassador to Japan. to phase out US forces from Europe.'

'Years later, Senator Nunn coauthored legislation aimed at making the Pentagon cooperate more earnestly with the NATO allies in bringing about greater standardization and interoperability of NATO weapon systems.'

'As the Senator expresses it: “What matters is not the money going into the Pentagon, but the military capabilities coming out.” ~ By James W. Canan | Aug. 1, 1985

https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0885nunn/




'In 1996, Sen. Nunn stepped down from the senate. Nunn was a centrist Democrat of the old school by weaving a coalition of black and rural voters, and was one of the last of his kind. Nunn tried to steer his party into the middle and was often frustrated. In his retirement remarks he described the Democratic Party as pursuing a “brain-dead defense of the status quo.” He praised the Republican revolution for seeking lower taxes and entitlement reform but also said the revolution was in danger of going to extremes.'

'In his retirement announcement he said that neither party is serving the people and that they need to break their dependence on money and special interests or a third party will surely rise. He called for two-year budgeting so the Congress can spend less time on passing money bills and more time overseeing how the money is spent. Nunn was the ninth senator to announce he won’t seek re-election in 1996, the eighth Democrat. Not much has changed since 1996.'

https://archive.humanevents.com/2007/08/14/will-nunn-run/

(Webpage m.i.a.)




'Nunn also is a board member for the Concord Coalition, a grassroots nongovernmental organization that seeks to educate citizens about the fiscal problems and challenges facing the United States.'

'Nunn is a retired senior partner with the law firm of King and Spalding in Atlanta, and a distinguished professor in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech. In addition, he serves on numerous boards of such publicly held corporations as the Coca-Cola Company, Dell Computer Corporation, General Electric, and Scientific Atlanta.'

'In 1991 Nunn voted to oppose U.S. military action in the Persian Gulf to oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. Many have speculated, and Nunn himself has admitted, that the negative vote ensured the early demise of his presidential candidacy in 1992.' ~ Tinaz Pavri | Originally published Dec 16, 2003 - Last edited Jul 17, 2018

https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/sam-nunn-b-1938/




'Senator Nunn’s public service continues today through his work at the Nuclear Threat Initiative and as chairman emeritus of CSIS. During a period of political polarization and partisanship, his reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to U.S. security interests.'

'Senator Nunn and Dr. Jones will be joined by Ambassador Laura Holgate, Vice President for Materials Risk Management at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, to discuss the book, Senator Nunn’s career in the Senate, and his continued work to address today’s nuclear dangers.' ~ Monday, May 17, 2021 11:00 am - 12:00 pm

https://www.csis.org/events/sam-nunn-statesman-nuclear-age




November 28th, 2022 Former Senator Sam Nunn 1 | Rotary Club Of Atlanta

Sen. Sam Nunn makes comments about the current Ukraine War, nuclear proliferation concerns and the hackability of our nuclear weapons upgrades.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcbRK__tMPI




'This book chronicles the journey McElroy took with Sam Nunn as he presented a message of common sense conservatism to the voters of Georgia in 1972. Nunn's principled approach to making government work through cooperation and compromise, and his demonstrated mastery of complex issues, placed him among a rare few considered every four years for the highest office in the land.'

https://www.amazon.com/Best-President-Nation-Never-Had/dp/088146628X













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Election Nonsense'



Election Nonsense


“The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably — PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots — overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher,” he explained.'

'The case is set for oral argument on Friday, Jan. 6, the second anniversary of the Capitol incursion.'

'Huckabee noted: “The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout, Kamala Harris is in that group, and so is Mike Pence.”

'He pointed to the criminal referral by the Jan. 6 committee for President Donald Trump and the FBI’s collusion with Twitter and Facebook to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election, in violation of the First Amendment, as examples of the unusual season the country is passing through.'

“Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections,” Canova contended.' ~ Randy DeSoto | January 3, 2023 at 7:22am

https://ijr.com/huckabee-announcement-scotus-case-flip-2020-biden-harris/




'Should they proceed to inaugurate Biden without settling the election through the quorums of Amendment XII it will be a disaster for his party and any executive actions will be challenged and eventually annulled.'

On what basis could such a claim ever be made? The media has told us it is all a "big lie" just like their own Trump-Russia collusion accusations, Steele Dossier stories, the Biden laptop "nothing burger" and social media's "misinformation" narratives. Perhaps TV journalist for PBS Lisa Desjardins can do a special on why she doesn't use the term "big lie" with regard to her fellow legacy media colleagues who are fumbling with the truth in all these areas.

Can she dispel these reasoned arguments about the presidential election?:

crisisalert.htm#links








-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Social Media Manipulations'



Social Media Manipulations


“The Twitter Files, Part One: How and Why Twitter Blocked the Hunter Biden Laptop Story,” Taibbi began, explaining that “On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published BIDEN SECRET EMAILS, an expose based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop.”

'In response to the story, which according to the New York Post would have changed the minds of many voters in the 2020 election had they known about the Hunter Biden laptop, Twitter took extraordinary action to suppress the story claiming that it broke the platform’s hacked material policy.'

'In the subsequent hours and days following the marking of the story as “unsafe,” Twitter employees went back and forth attempting to create a justification for censoring the story with the vice president of global communications asking, “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?” ~ Sterling Mosley | December 4, 2022

https://dcenquirer.com/twitter-files-censorship-hunter-biden-laptop/




'Elon Musk’s Twitter Truth Squad is exposing the FBI’s role in suppressing free speech before the 2020 election. But the FBI was practically a bit player in a far greater federal conspiracy to censor any American who cast doubts on the mail-in ballots that made Joe Biden the 46th president.'

'The Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency, created in 2018 as part of the Department of Homeland Security, gave grants to several private entities that formed the Election Integrity Project in mid-2020. That project, working closely with the feds, classified 22 million tweets as misinformation and affected “hundreds of millions of individual Facebook posts, YouTube videos, TikToks and tweets,” thanks to what it bragged of as “huge regulatory pressure” from government, per a Foundation for Freedom Online report last month.'

“The censorship focus was always and consistently foremost targeted at speech casting doubt on mail-in ballots,” FFO reported. That targeted effort devastated “the ability of concerned citizens to pressure their state representatives to take legal action on changing voting procedures” to prevent fraud.'

'US Civil Rights Commissioner Christian Adams noted that “Democrats succeeded in tossing out state laws related to absentee-ballot verification, deadlines and a whole range of laws all in the name of COVID. By and large, GOP efforts in court failed. It was a courtroom bloodbath that created vulnerabilities across the system.” ~ James Bovard | December 12, 2022 9:45pm

https://nypost.com/2022/12/12/twitter-files-reveal-how-federal-censors-made-mail-in-ballots-sacred-boosting-biden/




“Nearly two-thirds of [registered] voters [64 percent] think that Twitter employees engaged in political censorship during the 2020 election and the shadow banning of users.” Nor was there any doubt about which candidate benefitted: “Most voters [76 percent] think James Baker’s banning of Hunter Biden’s laptop tweets was politically motivated, and a plurality [48 percent] think Twitter executives were actively helping the Biden campaign during the last election.”

'It’s probable that the findings of an honest investigation into pre-Musk Twitter will reveal that the influence of the FBI was considerable in 2020 and, as the poll’s respondents believe, that it was meant to assist the Biden campaign. Unfortunately for the republic, it worked. At length, there will almost certainly be further revelations that rogue federal agencies and social media platforms colluded to assure Biden’s election. At the very least, it will ultimately become blindingly obvious that 2020 was by no means an immaculate election.' ~ DAVID CATRON | December 18, 2022, 11:34 PM

https://spectator.org/poll-voters-say-twitter-tilted-2020-election/













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-






*anchor for 'Maricopa County Fiasco'



Maricopa County Fiasco


'State law says that the Board of Supervisors must certify the canvass of an election no more than 20 days after Election Day, and November 28 is 20 days after election day.'

“My colleagues and I felt it was important to gather all the data and information we could about the administration of the November General Election before holding a public meeting to discuss certifying the results,” Board of Supervisors chairman Bill Gates said in a press release. “Far from rushing, we are being deliberate and methodical before certification.”

'However, he added he doesn’t like seeing a lack of trust in elections in the state and across the country.'

"Starting November 4, 2020, two months before I took office, election administration has been front and center news in Arizona, and it's been filled with hate and it's caused divisions where there shouldn't be divisions,” Richer said. “I imagine this will have to continue for at least for another few weeks, but I don't think it is good for Arizona and I hope it can change in 2023.” ~ Tom Joyce | Nov 28, 2022

https://www.thecentersquare.com/arizona/maricopa-county-certifies-election-results-despite-legal-threats/article_e4c2b022-6f54-11ed-bbfe-bf27968349e7.html




'The responses from election workers in key battleground districts and states around the country showed a mostly calm election cycle compared to 2020, with one massive and overwhelming exception. In Maricopa County, Arizona, election workers were appalled and aghast at how things had been run there.'

'Maricopa, which is home to almost 62 percent of Arizona’s 7.2 million people, was already in the news on Election Day for its hours-long lines and broken machines. After its close and contentious 2020 election, Maricopa County officials refused to cooperate with an audit of the election by state senators and dismissed concerns about how it conducts elections. This year, it took the county just under two full weeks to count ballots.'

'Election Day workers flooded the survey response team with stories of incompetence, chaos, and mismanagement that resulted in the disenfranchisement of voters.'

'Try as they might to downplay their administrative failures, Gates and Richer can’t hide the effect Maricopa’s abysmal voting problems had on the state’s elections. Even 84 percent of surveyed Maricopa election observers and workers reported they are “not at all confident” that Arizona’s election results are “completely accurate and honest.” ~ SHAWN FLEETWOOD | NOVEMBER 23, 2022

https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/23/maricopa-county-made-arizonas-elections-even-more-of-a-disaster-than-people-realize/




'In 2020, the votes of Maricopa County, where 6 out of 10 Arizonans live, were decisive for the narrow, declared victory of Joe Biden over Trump in the Grand Canyon State. Trump heatedly questioned the tally. Sensing misconduct, his supporters in the Arizona Legislature attempted to investigate the election. But Maricopa County politicians blocked these efforts.'

'Again, Maricopa County Supervisors and allied county officials were defiant. They didn’t give an inch when fighting in the friendly terrain of the media and the anti-Trump courts. Despite mountains of evidence, Lake and the other two candidates lost all their lawsuits challenging the election.'

'The corruption in Maricopa County was no secret to informed citizens in the county and state. In fact, for years, Maricopa County has been putting to shame the old-school corruption of Cook County, Illinois. I now frequently say that Maricopa County has replaced Cook County as the most corrupt county in the country.'

'Years before, Maricopa County officials showed they could take out prosecutors who dared to stand up to them. More than any other reason, this precedent is why Trump’s public appeals for “brave prosecutors and judges” to come forward have been in vain, particularly in Arizona.' ~ Rachel Alexander | January 3, 2023

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/01/03/maricopa-county-corruption-now-its-your-problem-too/













-Top- -Sources- -Bottom-














Commonwealth Party
Midterm Reaction
January 6, 2023