'The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.'
'No state shall, without the Consent of Congress......engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.'
Obviously, the case can be made that the president and some in the Congress are in violation of the Constitution. The proposed comprehensive immigration bill will merely legitimize the invading Aztlanian, MS-13ers, Islamic terrorists and other types of tax evading, document forging, identity stealing banditos who settle into the country. This is unacceptable and with the president's populist apologetics notwithstanding, yet another constitutional crisis and a security crisis of the Republic now exists. It was bad enough under Bush, but the longer that the issue is politically skirted without engaging troops to fortify the border, then the more likely it is that the emergency clauses of the above excerpts will have to be invoked with heavy consequence to those that have refused to do their duty -- assuming it is not already too late. Or to hell with it. If the federal government doesn't want to bother protecting us under our constitutional contract, why stay and pay taxes to them? We can secede to protect ourselves. Maybe then their penchant for imperial unionism will cause them to finally put federal troops within our border states.
How was it the Visigoths brought down the Roman Empire? Do we ever learn from history? The Mexican narco gang wars are at the border and Arizona was left wide open. The administration lets invaders in who will eventually plot to destroy the government amongst the other institutions of this nation. Dumb politicians. They are signing their own death warrants by letting the assassins in! Or maybe they are bribed to do such where they will be bunkered in or conveniently somewhere else when the attack happens. Then again, perhaps they are under duress from foreign forces already.
We know China now owns much of our debt; we need billions of dollars from abroad daily to keep our economy afloat. They are sending us adulterated or poisoned pet food, seafood, toothpaste, contaminated bee pollen and now word of toxic dry wall. China's military build-up is seen as a counter to U.S. clout in the Pacific if not the world. So how else would you weaken a potential enemy without having to fire a shot? You would get them in a position to allow weak borders with foreign combatants flooding in to subdue and conquer from the inside. Sounds conspiratorial yes, but how else would you explain the actions of your 'leaders' of late, especially in regards to our borders in a time of threat from international terrorism? This is not to discount any sell-out for expedient business or political interests as well. Still, you have to wonder - Was that D.C. madam and her company a Chinese firm? And with the foiled plots of late, any prediction for a massive terrorist attack does not seem too out of the question.
Because of the importance of this issue, we cannot afford the usual banter from the systemic participants. Lax borders are intolerable during the worldwide terror campaign of the Islamic Dominion. We must confront and demand action against the allowance of border anarchy and against the stalling of completion and enforcement of the border fence. Accordingly, when the president appears in public for rallies, speeches, campaign stomps, etc., you should carry banners that very visibly say:
MR. OBAMA -
PUT UP THAT WALL!